Should the NBA Limit Three-Point Attempts?

The NBA has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past decade, with the three-point shot becoming the league’s defining weapon. Analysts, coaches, and fans alike have debated whether this trend has made the game more exciting—or more predictable. Recently, sports commentator Dan Patrick suggested a radical solution: put a cap on the number of three-point attempts per game.

Would such a rule save the sport or ruin it? Let’s break down the most compelling pros and cons of this hypothetical rule change.

The Case for Limiting Threes

More Offensive Variety

By capping three-point attempts, teams would have to rely on a wider range of offensive strategies. Imagine seeing more mid-range specialists, dominant post scorers, and creative offensive sets that aren’t centered around perimeter shooting. This shift could bring much-needed balance to the game.

Reviving Physicality

A limit on threes might encourage teams to attack the paint more aggressively, bringing back the hard-nosed physicality that characterized past eras of basketball. Fans nostalgic for the grit of the 1990s might love this.

Increased Strategic Intrigue

A cap would force coaches to think more critically about when to deploy their limited three-point attempts. This could add a chess-like element to the game, where every deep shot is a carefully calculated risk.

The Case Against Limiting Threes

Diluting the Game’s Identity

Basketball has always been about evolution, and the three-point revolution is just the latest chapter. Limiting threes would fundamentally alter the game’s identity, potentially alienating players and fans who love its current dynamic.

Hindering Superstar Impact

Players like Stephen Curry, Damian Lillard, and Klay Thompson have redefined what it means to be a superstar through their three-point prowess. A cap on threes could diminish their ability to shine, making the league less exciting for their fans.

Unintended Consequences

If teams can’t rely on threes, they might take more inefficient long mid-range shots, leading to lower-scoring, less entertaining games. Additionally, enforcing such a rule could be messy, with penalties and in-game tracking potentially disrupting the flow of play.

What’s the Right Move?

While limiting threes is an intriguing idea, it might be too drastic a shift for a league that thrives on evolution and innovation. A better approach could be to incentivize other styles of play rather than restrict the three-point shot. For example:

Adjust defensive rules to allow more physicality, making it harder to generate open threes.

Introduce a 4-point line to reward deeper shots while opening space for post players and slashers.

Basketball’s beauty lies in its adaptability, and any changes should strike a balance between preserving the game’s integrity and keeping fans entertained.

Final Thoughts

Dan Patrick’s proposal sparks a fascinating conversation about the future of basketball. As the league continues to grow and evolve, finding ways to keep the game fresh without alienating its core audience will be key.

What do you think? Should the NBA take a radical step like limiting threes, or are there better ways to make the game more exciting? Let us know in the comments below!

2025 NBA Predictions

Our blog series inconjunction with our video series on Instagram, Tik Tok, and Twitter (X) looks to shed light on the future of basketball on 4 different levels.  

This entry focuses on the NBA level and goes deeper into various topics that from our point of view help our community understand or at least bring awareness to the topic.

Explosion of International Draft Prospects:

Building off the success of players like Victor Wembanyama and Luka Dončić, the 2025 NBA Draft will feature a record number of first-round international players. Teams will expand their global scouting reach, resolving the current gap in evaluating talent from underrepresented regions.

Increased Integration of Betting Features in Broadcasts

By 2025, nearly every NBA broadcast will prominently feature gambling elements, such as live odds, prop bets, and in-game predictions tailored to bettors. Networks will collaborate with sportsbooks to create interactive experiences, like placing bets directly through smart TVs or streaming platforms. This will boost engagement but may risk alienating traditional viewers who are less interested in gambling.

Expansion of Micro-Betting

Micro-betting—placing wagers on real-time game events like the next basket or possession outcome—will become a dominant form of NBA gambling. This trend will cater to younger, tech-savvy fans looking for instant gratification and could lead to increased viewership during live games, as every moment becomes a potential betting opportunity.T

Increased Adoption of Load Management Regulations:

With fan frustrations over star players missing games due to load management, the NBA will enforce stricter policies, such as limiting the number of “rest games” per season for non-injured players. Teams will adapt by improving in-game workload management through sports science.

Being that these are predictions they might be considered "WEIRD" to some, but if they do become a reality you will be able to say, "I seen this before and I knew it was coming". :)) 

The Rise of Developmental Conferences in College Athletics and a parallel with Premier League soccer

Developmental Conferences: A New Reality

With NIL opportunities dominating the recruitment process, the talent disparity between Power 4 programs and smaller schools is becoming more apparent. Mid-major and smaller conference programs, once hotbeds for cultivating under-the-radar talent, are increasingly serving as developmental hubs. Players now use these programs to showcase their abilities before being poached by Power 4 teams offering larger NIL packages, superior facilities, and the promise of competing on the national stage.

Rulings like Diego Pavia's—which reinforce the ability for players to transfer and benefit from NIL deals without significant restrictions—have further fueled this trend. While these rulings empower student-athletes, they also leave smaller programs vulnerable. Coaches invest time and resources into developing players, only to lose them after one or two breakout seasons.

The Premier League Parallel

This dynamic mirrors the world of European soccer. In the English Premier League, top clubs like Manchester City and Chelsea often scout and recruit talent from smaller clubs, paying hefty transfer fees to secure these players. These fees compensate the smaller clubs for their role in developing the athlete and provide a financial safety net to reinvest in their teams.

Imagine a similar model in college athletics. If a Power 4 school wants to recruit a standout player from a mid-major program, they should compensate the original school. For example:

• A school like Alabama recruits a standout basketball player from a mid-major like Saint Mary’s. Under a transfer fee system, Alabama would pay Saint Mary’s for the player’s development.
• These funds could then be used by the smaller program to improve facilities, recruit new talent, or retain existing players.

Benefits of a Transfer Fee System

1. Fair Compensation for Development: Smaller programs deserve recognition for nurturing talent. A transfer fee system ensures their efforts are not in vain.
2. Redistribution of Wealth: Much like revenue sharing in professional leagues, this system could help balance the financial inequality between Power 4 schools and smaller programs.
3. Incentivizing Retention: Programs might work harder to keep players if they know their efforts will be financially rewarded if transfers occur.
4. Leveling the Playing Field: While Power 4 schools will always have an advantage, a transfer fee system provides smaller programs with resources to remain competitive.

Challenges and Criticisms

While the idea has merit, implementing such a system in college athletics is not without challenges:

• Legal Hurdles: The NCAA and individual conferences would need to navigate the complex web of NIL rules and amateurism to ensure compliance.
• Athlete Autonomy: Critics may argue that such a system commodifies players, reducing their freedom of choice.
• Program Disparity: Wealthier mid-major programs might still benefit more than smaller, resource-strapped schools.

A Necessary Evolution

College athletics is no longer a simple world of amateur sports. The NIL/Collective era, combined with the transfer portal, has introduced dynamics that mirror professional sports leagues. While empowering athletes to maximize their value, these changes also risk turning smaller programs into feeder systems for the Power 4 conferences.

A transfer fee system—modeled after the Premier League—could be a solution that benefits all parties. Athletes still gain the freedom to transfer and capitalize on their value, while smaller programs are compensated for their role in the developmental process. This approach ensures a fairer distribution of resources and preserves the competitive integrity of college athletics.

As the landscape continues to evolve, the NCAA and conferences must act decisively. If unchecked, the current system risks further widening the gap between haves and have-nots, threatening the foundation of college sports as we know it.

2025 WNBA Predictions

Our blog series inconjunction with our video series on Instagram, Tik Tok, and Twitter (X) looks to shed light on the future of basketball on 4 different levels.  

This entry focuses on the WNBA level and goes deeper into various topics that from our point of view help our community understand or at least bring awareness to the topic.

Increased Salaries and Financial Stability

The Current Landscape:

WNBA players often seek supplemental income by playing overseas during the offseason. This dual workload takes a toll on their bodies and limits offseason recovery and development time.

How New Money Will Help:

• Higher Salaries:
  Increased investment will lead to significant salary cap raises, allowing players to earn competitive wages domestically. This reduces the reliance on overseas contracts, enabling athletes to focus solely on their WNBA careers.
• Enhanced Benefits:
  Players could gain access to better healthcare, maternity leave policies, and retirement planning, aligning the WNBA with the benefits provided in major men's leagues.

---

League Expansion

The Current Landscape:

With only 12 teams and 144 roster spots, many talented players go undrafted or are unable to secure a place in the league. This creates a bottleneck that limits opportunities for rising stars.

How New Money Will Help:

• Expansion Teams:
  Increased revenue will make expansion feasible, potentially adding 2–4 teams within the next few years. This will broaden the league’s footprint into untapped markets, such as cities with strong women’s basketball traditions (e.g., Portland, Denver).
• Broader Talent Pool:
  Expansion will allow more collegiate stars to transition to the professional level, retaining fan interest from the NCAA to the WNBA. Additionally, international players will have more opportunities to showcase their skills on a global stage.

---

Investment in Player Development

The Current Landscape:

The WNBA’s short season and limited training camps leave little time for player development.

How New Money Will Help:

• Developmental Leagues:
  The league could create a G-League equivalent, providing younger or overlooked players with a pathway to the pros.
• Facilities and Coaching:
  Teams will invest in state-of-the-art training facilities, advanced analytics, and specialized coaching staff, giving players the tools to maximize their potential.

---

Enhanced Marketing and Visibility

The Current Landscape:

Despite its growth, the WNBA still struggles to match the media coverage and sponsorship dollars of men’s sports.

How New Money Will Help:

• Bigger Media Deals:
  Enhanced funding will secure larger broadcast contracts, increasing exposure to new audiences.
• Player Branding:
  With higher salaries, players will have the time and resources to invest in personal branding, building fanbases and securing individual sponsorships.
• NIL Pipeline:
  Colleges will nurture athletes’ brands via NIL deals, creating a smoother transition to professional marketing campaigns.

---

Elevating the Fan Experience

The Current Landscape:

The WNBA’s in-game experience and fan engagement still have room to grow.

How New Money Will Help:

• Improved Arenas:
  Teams could upgrade arenas to provide a more engaging and comfortable fan experience.
• Community Outreach:
  Increased funds will allow franchises to invest in local outreach programs, building deeper connections with their communities.

---

Conclusion: Building a Sustainable Future

The allocation of significant funds to women’s basketball has the potential to revolutionize the WNBA. Higher salaries will attract and retain elite talent, expansion will offer more opportunities, and investments in development and marketing will ensure sustainable growth. Ultimately, these changes will elevate the WNBA’s standing in the sports world and inspire the next generation of athletes and fans.

Being that these are predictions they might be considered "WEIRD" to some, but if they do become a reality you will be able to say, "I seen this before and I knew it was coming". :)) 

College athletes or College employees

If college student-athletes were treated as employees of their universities, the dynamics of their relationship with the institution would change significantly, potentially offering a range of benefits. Here’s a hypothetical scenario and the associated advantages:

Benefits for Athlete-Employees

1. Fair Compensation

Salaries: Athletes receive a base salary based on their sport, performance, and contribution to the program’s revenue.

Bonuses: Performance-based bonuses for team success, academic achievements, or individual accolades.

2. Comprehensive Health Benefits

Health Insurance: Coverage includes sports injuries, mental health counseling, and preventive care.

Long-term Care: Policies covering chronic injuries and post-graduation rehabilitation.

3. Retirement Savings

Contributions to a 401(k)-like plan or university pension program, helping athletes build financial security.

4. Workers’ Compensation

Full coverage for injuries sustained during training, games, or travel, including medical expenses and lost wages.

5. Professional Development Opportunities

Access to training programs, career counseling, and networking events to prepare for life after sports.

6. Union Representation

Athletes have collective bargaining rights, ensuring their voices are heard in matters of working conditions, schedules, and benefits.

7. Educational Benefits

Free or subsidized tuition for undergraduate and graduate programs, ensuring academic development Additional stipends for books, supplies, and tutoring..

8. Paid Time Off

Entitlement to personal days, vacation days, and sick leave, allowing athletes to rest and recover.

9. Enhanced NIL Opportunities

Clearer guidelines for Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, with the university offering marketing support.

10. Job Security

Multi-year employment contracts prevent unjust termination based solely on performance or injury.

11. Transparency and Accountability

Clear protocols for addressing grievances related to coaching staff, facilities, or academic support.

12. Tax Benefits

Potential tax deductions for expenses incurred as part of their athletic role, such as travel or equipment.

OBSTACLES 

The most pressing obstacle is the fundamental redefinition of the NCAA's amateurism model and its broader implications.The NCAA has long maintained that college athletes are "student-athletes" whose primary purpose is education, not employment. Redefining them as employees challenges this core principle, potentially triggering a cascade of legal, economic, and logistical issues. Here’s why this stands out:

1. Legal Implications: Recognizing athletes as employees would likely involve changes in labor laws, such as the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), granting athletes the right to unionize and collectively bargain. This could lead to a fragmented system where athletes from some schools or conferences are employees, while others are not.

2. Tax and Scholarship Status: Employee-athletes might have their scholarships and stipends classified as taxable income, increasing their financial burden.

3. Competitive Balance: Wealthier schools with larger athletic budgets could offer more attractive employment packages, exacerbating disparities between programs and potentially undermining competitive equity.

4. Impact on Non-Athletic Students: The financial burden on universities might lead to increased tuition or reallocation of funds away from academic programs and student services to cover the cost of paying athletes.

5. TITLE X: Institutions might struggle to sustain non-revenue programs at their current levels, potentially undermining the progress Title IX has achieved in expanding opportunities for female athletes. Balancing the financial realities of employee-athletes while maintaining gender equity would require careful planning and innovation to uphold the principles of Title IX.

Still, such a model could significantly improve the welfare of student-athletes, emphasizing equity and support for their dual roles as students and athletes.

2025 College Basketball Predictions

Our blog series inconjunction with our video series on Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter (X) looks to shed light on the future of basketball on 4 different levels. 

This entry focuses on the college level and goes deeper into various topics that from our point of view help our community understand or at least bring awareness to the topic.

Transfer Portal Regulation:

The NCAA will introduce stricter guidelines or windows for the transfer portal to reduce the chaos of mass transfers. For example, requiring athletes to consult with compliance officers or academic advisors before entering could help mitigate rash decisions and foster more program stability.

Expanded Conference Realignments Impacting Tournament Selection: 

As conference realignments grow, mid-major programs will face more challenges making the NCAA tournament. However, smaller conferences will combat this by investing in competitive non-conference schedules, ensuring their champions earn better seeding.

College Collective Transparency:

Transparency from college administrators and coaches is critical in the NIL era to ensure fairness, compliance, and trust within the college sports ecosystem. Administrators must provide clear guidelines on how NIL opportunities are integrated with academic and athletic priorities, ensuring these deals benefit student-athletes without compromising their education or eligibility. Coaches, on the other hand, must openly communicate how NIL agreements fit into team dynamics, preventing favoritism or friction among players. Transparent policies from leadership not only protect student-athletes from exploitation but also maintain the integrity of the program, fostering a culture where athletes, parents, and stakeholders feel confident in the process.

Rise of “Positionless” Basketball:

Position-less systems will continue dominating college basketball, with an emphasis on versatile players who can defend multiple positions and create mismatches offensively. Teams that invest in developing players’ complete skill sets will thrive, overcoming the current one-dimensional recruiting model.

Being that these are predictions they might be considered "WEIRD" to some, but if they do become a reality you will be able to say, "I seen this before and I knew it was coming". :)) 

2025 Grassroots Level Predictions (High School/AAU)

Our blog series inconjunction with our video series on Instagram, Tik Tok, and Twitter(X) looks to shed light on the future of basketball on 4 different levels. 

This entry focuses on the grassroots level and goes deeper into various topics that from our point of view help our community understand or at least bring awareness to the topic.

Increased Focus on Individualized Development Over Games:

With the rise of player-specific trainers and skill development specialists, the emphasis will shift from showcasing in numerous tournaments to enhancing individual skills. Parents and athletes are growing frustrated with the “over-scheduled” AAU season, where game opportunities often outweigh meaningful development. Programs will start incorporating mandatory skill sessions or “development blocks” into their yearly plans to address this. 

Intregration of NIL opportunities in Grassroots Basketball:

As NIL opportunities become more accessible to high school athletes, elite grassroots programs will include NIL education and support as part of their offerings. This will help players and families navigate NIL without falling prey to potential exploitative deals, thus providing long-term value to their careers.

Data-Driven Recruitment Models: 

High-level grassroots programs and events will increasingly use advanced data analytics (e.g., wearable technology, shot tracking) to provide quantifiable performance metrics to college recruiters, overcoming the current reliance on subjective scouting reports.

Being that these are predictions they might be considered "WEIRD" to some, but if they do become a reality you will be able to say, "I seen this before and I knew it was coming". :)) 

4 BENEFITS of "FORM SHOOTING"

Shooting is without a doubt  one of the most necessary skills in today’s game of basketball.  We see Curry, Lillard ,Thompson and others shooting from the “ logo” but before they were able to do so they had to perfect their form.  

Despite what some “notable trainers” might profess form shooting is the industry standard for developing proper shooting mechanics.  

Here are 4 benefits for form shooting.

1. Focus on Technique: Stationary form shooting allows players to concentrate on the fundamentals of their shooting mechanics without the distractions of movement. This helps in developing consistent form, including proper hand placement, follow-through, and balance.

2. Muscle Memory Development: Repeating the correct shooting form while stationary helps engrain the movement patterns into muscle memory. This makes it easier to replicate the correct form in game situations, even under pressure.

3. Improved Shooting Consistency: By eliminating variables like movement or defense, players can focus on shooting the ball consistently from a fixed position. This repetition helps build a reliable shooting routine.

4. Confidence Building: Successful stationary form shooting drills build a player's confidence by providing them with repeated, successful shooting experiences. This confidence can translate into more effective shooting during live play.